MASQUE DE PROTECTION RESPIRATOIRE

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, French and world wellbeing bouclier faciaux  specialists have guaranteed that wearing a veil is just important in case of side effects. On April 2, the Academy of Medicine ran contrary to the natural order of things, suggesting the wearing of a veil for the whole populace. Suggestion shared by a few specialists and researchers. Starting now and into the foreseeable future, wearing a veil is necessary openly transport, schools and certain open spaces. How to make them yourself? Here are two instructional exercises offered by specialists.

When COVID-19 showed up on French soil, the Ministry of Health, Public Health France and WHO - French and world wellbeing specialists - called for wearing a veil just in case of side effects , particularly hack . " There is no particular proof to recommend that the mass populace is wearing covers of specific advantage ," said Dr. Mike Ryan on Monday March 30. The leader of the WHO pestilences even noticed that " some proof recommends the inverse " raising the dangers of an evil fitting cover or contacting your face when evacuating or putting it on.

However, on April 5, the Academy of Medicine contraindicated the administration in an official statement 1 and urged the populace to wear a cover: "to be compelling, the wearing of the counter sprinkle veil must be summed up in broad daylight space. This measure can just epidemiologically affect the course of the infection if each individual constrains to apply it when he leaves his home. "

This is affirmed by specific authorities of overall acknowledgment, including George Gao, researcher and chief general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. " The serious mix-up in the United States and Europe is, as I would like to think, that the populace doesn't wear a veil. This infection is transmitted by respiratory beads, through close contact. Beads assume a significant job - henceforth the need to wear a cover, since when we talk, there are unavoidably that come out of the mouth. Many influenced people are asymptomatic, or don't show indications yet. On the off chance that they wear a veil, this can forestall transporters beads of the infection to get away and taint others , "has he said March 27 the columnist Jon Cohen 3 .

Suggestions paid attention to by the administration. On April 13, Emmanuel Macron reports that the French will have the option to profit by a veil known as the overall population from the eleventh . These insurances are presently obligatory in broad daylight transport, universities and spots where "the standards of physical separation can't be ensured", subtleties a pronouncement distributed on May 11 . They are suggested by numerous specialists, including those from the National Academy of Medicine, in every single open space.

For what reason did the specialists not prescribe wearing the cover to the entire populace?

In contrast to some Asian nations, including China, wearing a cover for the whole populace has never been a piece of French wellbeing suggestions, regardless of whether to shield oneself from contamination or infectious sicknesses. Likewise, the French choice not to prescribe the wearing of the veil to the entire populace was chosen during a lack of covers. For the specialist and host of the "Wellbeing magazine" Marina Carrère d'Encausse, these wellbeing rules can be viewed as a "lie" called "for a decent motivation" , reveals to us France Info .

WHO additionally advances the wearing of veils as a need for human services staff, yet doesn't totally prohibit the possibility of ​​allowing everybody to secure the other. "We have to save clinical and careful covers for forefront staff. Yet, the possibility of ​​using covers covering the aviation routes or mouth to forestall hacking or wheezing from spreading the infection to the earth and to others (...) is certifiably not an impractical notion in itself, " said Dr Mike Ryan, a specialist in crisis circumstances at the WHO, at a question and answer session.

In the event that the FFP2 covers permit the individuals who wear them not to come into contact with postilions or beads possibly polluted by an infection, this isn't the situation for careful veils, or custom made. These are not proposed to shield clients from the infection. These gadgets forestall the projection of beads or postillons of the wearer of the cover, yet don't permit the wearer to shield himself from the particles present noticeable all around. At the end of the day, they help limit the spread of the infection . It is in this way intriguing to wear a cover when voyaging or in any event, during deconfinement.

A group of scientists from Yale University in the United States 4 has likewise contemplated the nations where it isn't unexpected to wear covers, quite South Korea and Japan, and have contrasted with nations where the wearing of veils does isn't the standard like in Italy. As per their outcomes, the covers diminish the development rate in the two cases and the passings by up to 10% . All the more shockingly, the monetary advantage has been assessed at between $ 3,000 and $ 6,000 for each extra veil worn openly, because of the more slow spread of the infection.